Bids are not comparable
Bidders priced different quantities and inclusions; comparing bottom lines is meaningless.
Advisory & Project Recovery B4
A tender with non-comparable bids does not identify the best contractor — it identifies whoever priced the least scope. We normalise the bids and make the award defensible.
How it is bought
We reply within 1 business day. A commercial proposal follows within 5 business days of the scoping meeting.
In substance
The main source of cost growth in construction tenders is an incomplete bill of quantities. Bidders adopt different assumptions, the winner is whoever excluded most scope, and the difference returns as variations. We close that gap at the documentation stage.
Bidders priced different quantities and inclusions; comparing bottom lines is meaningless.
Part of the scope is undescribed and the gap is closed by variations after award.
The decision follows price while capability, resources and programme go unassessed.
A transparent procedure and documented comparison are required.
Experience, resources, financial standing and current workload were never checked.
Scope of works, bills of quantities, quality and acceptance requirements, contract form and procedure rules.
Experience, resources, current workload, financial standing and reputation verified.
Bids normalised to a common scope, assessed against technical and commercial criteria, with hidden exclusions and risks exposed.
Commercial and technical negotiations to firm up scope and terms.
With First in Law we prepare a balanced contract and hand the project into delivery.
Deliverables
The specific documents, reports and management products that remain with the client.
Comparison is made on identical scope rather than on headline price.
A complete bill of quantities removes the bulk of future cost growth.
The award can be defended to shareholders, the board and lenders.
Liability, acceptance, retention and warranties are expressed as mechanisms that function.
FAQ
Not answered here? Write to us and we will respond on your case.
4–8 weeks from documentation start to award recommendation, depending on package size, bidder count and the work needed on the bills of quantities.
No. We run the procedure, normalise the bids and issue a justified recommendation. The decision and the signature remain with the client.
Yes. Design tenders have their own logic: evaluation weighs documentation scope and depth, the lead engineer's credentials and the issue programme, not price alone.
Procurement, tendering, contracts, change orders and claims.
An independent diagnosis in 3–5 weeks: the real date, the real cost, an action plan.
We manage the project on the owner's behalf — from the land plot to commissioning.
An independent review of budget and schedule in 2–4 weeks, before the decision.
Tell us about the asset and the current stage — we will propose a working format and team composition. A commercial proposal follows within five business days of the meeting.
We reply within 1 business day. A commercial proposal follows within 5 business days of the scoping meeting.